![]() ![]() I'm more likely to judge them fairly and sympathetically, anyway. None of this is meant to suggest that there are certain inherently right or wrong ways to develop IF all I'm saying is that there are works I'm more and less likely to enjoy interacting with, and I want to spend my time on things I actually enjoy. Since that's still a lot of games (24), I'm prioritizing games based on how interesting their description sounds to me. When it comes right down to it, I'd rather be trying to figure out how to wrap the dragon's chain around the post than trying to figure out which version of a Windows 'terp happens to work well under Wine.) I'm going to try to get through as many games that fit those criteria as I can during the month of October. This criterion sometimes also rules out Windows executables, if they don't work well under Wine. But I'd rather put this effort and time into interacting with games written by people who aren't making a development decision that includes a belief, however tangential to the main part of their development decision-making process, however subconscious, that they're OK with a development system that cuts off or mandates a lot of extra work some potential interactors, including me. (This second criterion rules out works written in ALAN, ADRIFT, and Quest, some of which I might be able to get running with some effort and time. With so many entries this year, I'm applying some basic filtering criteria to which games I'm going to play: I'm only playing parser-based games that are designed to run in interpreters that are easily available for Linux. The IFComp 2017 home page can be found here. (There are six weeks for competition judging, but I'm going to be moving during the last two, which means that I probably won't be playing much, if at all.) My plan is to try to play a dozen or so mediumish games over the next month, and a few shorter ones. This is the first time I've taken notes on games I've played in IFComp, and it's the first time I've voted! I'm using Jacqueline Lott's rubric for my scores. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |